SIR JOHN HEGARTY HOPES TO BE SURPRISED BY THE WORK HE SEES AT ADFEST
Sir John Hegarty, chairman and worldwide creative director, BBH, London, warns that scam advertising is a very serious problem, and if it continues, will undermine completely the value of awards and end up destroying them.
Hegarty, who received a knighthood in the Queen’s birthday honours in 2007, is heading to Asia as the film jury president at AdFest 2009, taking place March 19-21 in Thailand. As a region Asia struggles with the problem of scam advertising, a practice that has been reduced in some other markets by stricter judging processes.
He told Campaign Brief Asia: “Festival organisers have to understand this. I’ve likened it to drug use in sport. The Olympic authorities have realised if they don’t stamp it out it will destroy everything they’ve built. The same applies to our competitions.”
He has no expectations over what the standard of work will be like at AdFest – whenever he sits on a jury he hopes to be surprised.
“To see some wonderful work that hasn’t been picked up by the media. That’s the upside of judging a show,” he says.
While the global financial downturn has created an atmosphere of gloom and doom in the global industry, and Hegarty says that like any agency, BBH is not immune to the recession, he argues that it is an expanding company with a robust vision of what the future is all about.
He expects that vision and the quality of BBH’s work to sustain them over the coming years.
Hegarty says: “Whenever a recession occurs, this is my fifth, it forces companies to look at their product and ensure they’re offering genuine value for their clients. Value that can be translated into sales. The first thing all those agencies should do is stop doing scam work. Focus your creative department on turning out genuine ground breaking sales-related work. Not something that will be seen by a few awards juries and their friends.”
How does he expect the work at AdFest to compare to that awarded at the Cannes International Advertising Festival in June?
He says: “Cannes is naturally a global festival attracting awards from everywhere. AdFest is still seen as regional, although Asia is a pretty big region. So naturally Cannes will have the pick of all the best work. But if AdFest develops a global reputation that could change. Nothing is forever,” he says.
Recognised as one of the industry’s greatest statesmen, Hegarty’s advertising career started in 1965 as a junior art director at Benton and Bowles before joining Cramer Saatchi, which became Saatchi & Saatchi, as a founding shareholder. In 1973 he co-found TBWA London as creative director, leaving in 1982 to start BBH. His awards include two D&AD Golds and six Silvers, Cannes Golds and Silvers, and British Television Gold and Silvers. He was awarded the D&AD President’s Award for outstanding achievement in the advertising industry and the Lifetime Achievement award at the 2005 Clio Awards and has been appointed to the New York’s One Club Hall of Fame and the New York Art Directors Club Hall of Fame.

30 Comments
Couldn’t agree more. Good point well made. Just a pity he has to keep telling people.
This is the only advertising guy who’s worthy of the title ‘Sir’.
Scam is like a cockroach. It’ll never dissapear.
The last of the gentlemen. What a class act!
hmm…. once all the scam is weeded out of adfest this year, they should have about 3 ads to judge. nice!
Sir John is going to find AdFest confronting!
Listen to you lot. How fuckin boring would we all be if we didn’t have a few creative opportunities? It’s ok for John Hegarty and BBH london with their client list but we deal with real clients in Asia every day and not one of them would accept the ideas BBH london come up with, even if John presented them himself. Proof? BBH in Singapore.
Sure. Everyone says scam is bad. But you keep seeing people get good jobs on the back of it, because too many people get suckered in by numbers of shiny metal pieces, rather than the actual quality of the work.
If people could judge a book and reel by its content, rather than the list of awards up the front of it, it wouldn’t be a problem. But deciding FOR YOURSELF if something is good or not isn’t easy. You need to know good work from bad, and pretend from legit. This is something a lot of MD’s and agency CEO’s wouldn’t have a clue about, unfortunately. Some CD’s too.
And yes, yes, yes… I have a list of awards (80% legit, 20% scam), so spare me the ‘get back to your DL brochure you awardless hack’ response OK.
Scam bad. Adland’s reliance on numbers of awards as the sole indicator of a creatives worth… even worse.
8.24 – While I agree with your sentiments that too many are suckered in by shiny metal, your attitude that “nobody but creatives know good work” is exactly what perpetuates the situation. This basically then results in work being created to impress only the creative fraternity. This is hard to achieve with a real brief, hence the rise of scamming.
Truly great work should speak for itself, regardless of the audience.
11.57. That’s a pathetic argument. No market is better or worse. Just different. Perhaps you’re in the wrong town?
it isn;t just Hegarty, Paul Fishlock at The Palace is on the record as well. And there are others.The tide’s against you 11.57. Your argument in childish and flawed. Do some real work that gets bought and sells product, as opposed to your fragile ego. That is the job after all.
Scam sucks, no doubt about it. However there is a huge difference between ‘scam’ and being ‘pro-active’.
We have a client who have no idea what a great brand they have, and how creative they can be. Its taken us being pro-active to push them into an area of now accepting great work and interesting briefs
Now as for the dog groomers, funeral parlours, lawn mower men…scam, scam, scam.
Without the benefits of scam BBH wouldn’t have anyone in their creative department so excuse me while I work on my profile so I can one day work there.
The real problem here that scam practitioners cant wiggle out of is that because of the their total and utter subservience to scam, they have lost all respect…both outside and surprisingly inside their agencies.
In times like these, clients and agency heads are counting on creativity to solve some tough business issues. (Imagine trying to get someone to buy a car now, or perhaps some diamond jewelry!)
Instead, while there is a crisis burning down the door, suits are being told, can you find a client for this or can you pull some strings to run this somewhere. Distracting the agency completely from the reason it exists.
There is just no point doing scam while the real work gets second class treatment. As a planner, I sit in stunned amusement sometimes when a team that is no stranger to walking up awards podiums shares shockingly banal and resigned ideas at a real business review.
After looking at the banking meltdown, we must realise very quickly that no industry is infallible. All it takes is dishonest practices and a lack of regulation, driven by greed to bring on a collapse. Sounds familiar?
11:57.
Last time I checked on Best Ads, BBH Singapore was on the exact same level as Saatchi and Saatchi, O&M and BBDO. All of which have, as far as I can see, never won an award for anything even close to a real client with a real brief.
Also, about 5 years ago they had, according to the Gunn Report, the best ad in the entire world.
And that’s with real briefs and real clients. So your “no one can do great work in Asia” comment basically comes off as an excuse for being either lazy, incompetent or both.
John Hegarty is being incredibly generous in his advice to rival agencies. Perhaps it’s because he knows that no one is going to heed his words anyway.
He should just let them go about their scamming ways. And slowly take all their business from under their noses. The ongoing Singapore Tourism pitch will be a good place to start.
The problem isn’t young creatives wanting to do scam to further their careers, the problem is lazy greedy CDs and ECDs who can’t see past trophies. Wake up, ECDs. go solve a fucking business problem every now and then in between doing flashlight ads. show your worth as thinkers in business.
What 1:08 PM said. Exactly right.
Ah the age old debate.
I agree that Scams do tend to have a detrimental effect on awards. If it hasn’t already.
I have done my fair share of award winning work, both legit and scam. I admit legit work feels better.
But really, all the people condemning scams would have better results in their fight if they came up with legit work that outdid the scams instead of whining every time a scam ad beats them at the shows.
One thing the scams do is raise the level of creative thinking. Albeit wrongfully so.
That is something legit work should be doing but isn’t.
The Award shows? They’d be forced to give the award to the BEST work. If the legit work was being pushed to that level, it would and should beat the scams as well.
So if the legit work clearly isn’t up to speed, and gets beaten by a scam ad. The legit work creatives say a scam beat them. Well, if the idea was good enough to begin with, it wouldn’t have lost. Now they just come across as whiny crybabies.
And the debate will just go on and on and on…
Legit work winning big pretty much shuts up everyone. So that’s where the fight should really be. Even scammers HAVE TO respect that.
But here’s the real problem.
Aside from creatives, who are really to blame for scams? Well, I believe the suits should share some of the blame. Particularly suits who would rather sell easy work that push the really good stuff.
Making the creatives in desperate need of good work in their book resort to scams.
Suits actually prefer scams outside of the regular work because it is easier for them as well. They don’t need backbone to defend scams. But they need it for really good legit work.
I know one CSD who actually says: “Let’s just give client what they want. And let’s just do some initiatives for creative reputation.” That’s the CLIENT SERVICE DIRECTOR saying that. And in our market she is highly respected by clients and creatives alike. She understands the importance of reputation but isn’t willing to work to make clients buy good work.
In an economic crisis age where we are expected to keep clients happy, suits are gleefully using the crisis to stamp out any attempt to push for good work.
It should be the whole agency willing to fight for good work, not just creatives.
Left to fend for themselves, the creatives resort to scam or they get left behind.
In the end, talk is cheap for both sides. The work will win out. Legit or otherwise.
Weary CD hits the nail on the head!
A weary argument from a weary CD!
Anyone who builds their career purely on scam will have a tough time getting out of Asia. Many of those that did have got caught out spectacularly and suffered the consequences. That’s because none of that brilliant thinking ever seems to come out for a real brief on which millions of $$$$$$ are resting.
If scamsters could do a a good ad on a real brief, no one would begrudge them their shot at winning awards.
Weary CD you don’t understand the concept of making money.
Scam is cheating against everyone you work with, period. I don’t want to work with you if you got to wear you are by making faking ads. I earned my way with my work, all real. If you couldn’t o that without cheating, you’re a hack and you’re probably not going to very good working on real briefs in the real world.
If you couldn’t win with an scam ad, you’re entirely worthless as a creative. It’s a parlour game. The real work is the other 99%.
It’s amazing how many unconstructive haters are out there.
Scam vs Legit. Good vs Awful. Which is more important?
Crap that are legit does not make it any better.
An awful scam is even worse.
For those who are on the moral high ground, ask yourself honestly..
A) Would you marry a beautiful person if you knew he/she had cosmetic surgery.
B) Rather marry a hideous person who is 100% authentic.
Think, think about it.
7.02 you are a joke
I’d rather have the good looking one with plastic surgery, thanks.
You idiots. Scam is rife in a bunch of industries.
The wine company that makes a special blend for the judges.
The restaurant that makes an extra effort for the critic.
The Hollywood studio that puts out the special movie for the shot at the Oscars.
Get with the program: awards are a measure of talent, but not necessarily business success. (Profit is the best measure of that.)
“Taxi Driver Convention” by BBH. D&AD (mid 1990s).
It’s one of the greatest scam ads of all time.
6.40 thanks for clearing that up, i feel so much better now.
Weary CD cannot write.